Loom
Twilio
| Feature | Loom | Twilio |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $12.5/mo | Free only |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Best For | remote-teams, developers, customer-success, managers, educators | developers, enterprise, startups, communication-platforms |
| Founded | 2015 | 2008 |
| Screen Recording | ✓ | ✗ |
| Video Messages | ✓ | ✗ |
| Transcription | ✓ | ✗ |
| Reactions | ✓ | ✗ |
| Video Editing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Analytics | ✓ | ✗ |
| Sms Api | ✗ | ✓ |
| Voice Api | ✗ | ✓ |
| Video Api | ✗ | ✓ |
| Email Api | ✗ | ✓ |
| Verify | ✗ | ✓ |
| Flex Contact Center | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Loom Pros
- Instant async video communication
- Screen + webcam recording
- Auto-transcription and captions
- Slack and Notion integration
✗ Loom Cons
- 25-video limit on free plan
- 5-minute recording limit on free
- Requires good internet for fast uploads
✓ Twilio Pros
- Comprehensive APIs
- Reliable infrastructure
- Great documentation
- Global reach
✗ Twilio Cons
- Complex pricing
- Expensive at scale
- Requires developers
The Verdict
Loom is built for remote teams and developers, with a focus on screen-recording and video-messages. Twilio targets developers and enterprise and leads with sms-api and voice-api.
Twilio uses custom enterprise pricing, while Loom starts at $12.5/mo — a tangible advantage for teams with a fixed budget.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Both tools are a solid fit for developers — in those cases, the decision often comes down to workflow style and how your team prefers to organize work.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.
