Loom
Microsoft Teams
| Feature | Loom | Microsoft Teams |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $12.5/mo | Free / from $4/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Best For | remote-teams, developers, customer-success, managers, educators | enterprise, teams, microsoft-users, remote-workers |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
| Screen Recording | ✓ | ✗ |
| Video Messages | ✓ | ✗ |
| Transcription | ✓ | ✗ |
| Reactions | ✓ | ✗ |
| Video Editing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Analytics | ✓ | ✗ |
| Chat | ✗ | ✓ |
| Video Meetings | ✗ | ✓ |
| Channels | ✗ | ✓ |
| File Sharing | ✗ | ✓ |
| Apps | ✗ | ✓ |
| Whiteboard | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Loom Pros
- Instant async video communication
- Screen + webcam recording
- Auto-transcription and captions
- Slack and Notion integration
✗ Loom Cons
- 25-video limit on free plan
- 5-minute recording limit on free
- Requires good internet for fast uploads
✓ Microsoft Teams Pros
- Included with Microsoft 365
- Great video calling
- Deep Office integration
- Large meeting capacity
✗ Microsoft Teams Cons
- Resource heavy
- Complex admin settings
- Can feel cluttered
- Requires Microsoft ecosystem
The Verdict
Loom is built for remote teams and developers, with a focus on screen-recording and video-messages. Microsoft Teams targets enterprise and teams and leads with chat and video-meetings.
On pricing, Microsoft Teams is the clear winner for budget-conscious users — starting at $4/mo compared to $12.5/mo for Loom. That $8.5/mo difference adds up quickly for growing teams.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.
