Ghost
Kit
| Feature | Kit | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $9/mo | Free / from $25/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Best For | professional-bloggers, independent-publishers, news-sites, creators | bloggers, podcasters, youtubers, online-course-creators |
| Founded | 2013 | 2013 |
| Publishing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Newsletters | ✓ | ✗ |
| Memberships | ✓ | ✗ |
| Seo | ✓ | ✗ |
| Themes | ✓ | ✗ |
| Integrations | ✓ | ✗ |
| Self Hosting | ✓ | ✗ |
| Visual Automations | ✗ | ✓ |
| Landing Pages | ✗ | ✓ |
| Creator Network | ✗ | ✓ |
| Commerce | ✗ | ✓ |
| Subscriber Tagging | ✗ | ✓ |
| Rss To Email | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Ghost Pros
- Open-source and self-hostable (free)
- Native membership and paid subscription support
- Fast and SEO-friendly by default
- Clean writing experience without bloat
✗ Ghost Cons
- Themes require code knowledge to customize
- Smaller plugin ecosystem than WordPress
- Self-hosting requires technical maintenance
✓ Kit Pros
- Built specifically for creators
- Visual automation builder
- Creator Network for growth
- Excellent deliverability rates
✗ Kit Cons
- Limited email template designs
- A/B testing only on subject lines
- Gets expensive with subscriber growth
The Verdict
Ghost is built for professional bloggers and independent publishers, with a focus on publishing and newsletters. Kit targets bloggers and podcasters and leads with visual-automations and landing-pages.
On pricing, Ghost is the clear winner for budget-conscious users — starting at $9/mo compared to $25/mo for Kit. That $16/mo difference adds up quickly for growing teams.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Feature-wise, Ghost offers broader built-in capabilities (7 features vs 6), while Kit takes a more focused approach — which can mean a simpler, faster onboarding experience.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.