Ghost
Grammarly
| Feature | Ghost | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $9/mo | Free / from $12/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Best For | professional-bloggers, independent-publishers, news-sites, creators | writers, students, professionals, non-native-speakers |
| Founded | 2013 | 2009 |
| Publishing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Newsletters | ✓ | ✗ |
| Memberships | ✓ | ✗ |
| Seo | ✓ | ✗ |
| Themes | ✓ | ✗ |
| Integrations | ✓ | ✗ |
| Self Hosting | ✓ | ✗ |
| Grammar | ✗ | ✓ |
| Spelling | ✗ | ✓ |
| Tone | ✗ | ✓ |
| Clarity | ✗ | ✓ |
| Plagiarism | ✗ | ✓ |
| Browser Extension | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Ghost Pros
- Open-source and self-hostable (free)
- Native membership and paid subscription support
- Fast and SEO-friendly by default
- Clean writing experience without bloat
✗ Ghost Cons
- Themes require code knowledge to customize
- Smaller plugin ecosystem than WordPress
- Self-hosting requires technical maintenance
✓ Grammarly Pros
- Works everywhere
- Clear suggestions
- Tone detection
- Plagiarism checker
✗ Grammarly Cons
- Premium is pricey
- Can over-correct
- Privacy concerns
The Verdict
Ghost is built for professional bloggers and independent publishers, with a focus on publishing and newsletters. Grammarly targets writers and students and leads with grammar and spelling.
Pricing is close: Ghost starts at $9/mo versus $12/mo for Grammarly — not a deciding factor on its own.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Feature-wise, Ghost offers broader built-in capabilities (7 features vs 6), while Grammarly takes a more focused approach — which can mean a simpler, faster onboarding experience.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.
