Online whiteboards have become essential for remote and hybrid teams. Miro and FigJam are the two dominant players, but they serve different audiences. Miro is a full-featured visual collaboration platform. FigJam is a lightweight whiteboard built into the Figma ecosystem. Here’s how they compare in 2026.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Miro | FigJam |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | Free (3 boards) | Free for all Figma users |
| Paid Plans | $8–$20/user/mo | $3/editor/mo (standalone) |
| Best For | Workshops, strategy, all teams | Design teams on Figma |
| Canvas Size | Infinite | Infinite |
| Templates | 2,500+ community templates | 300+ templates |
| Widgets | ✅ Extensive marketplace | ✅ Built-in + community |
| AI Features | Miro AI (summarize, generate) | Figma AI (auto-layout, generate) |
| Voting/Timer | ✅ Native | ✅ Via widgets |
| Video Chat | ✅ Built-in | ❌ (use Figma’s multiplayer cursors) |
Feature Deep Dive
Canvas and Drawing Tools
Miro’s canvas is vast and versatile. You get sticky notes, shapes, connectors, freehand drawing, text boxes, frames, and a pen tool. The infinite canvas handles hundreds of objects without lag. Zooming in and out is smooth, and the minimap helps navigate large boards.
FigJam offers a similar set of primitives — stickies, shapes, connectors, stamps, and markers — but with a lighter touch. The drawing tools feel more playful (highlighter pens, stamp reactions, stickers). The canvas is equally infinite, though FigJam boards tend to stay smaller because the tool encourages focused collaboration rather than sprawling diagrams.
Winner: Miro for large, complex canvases. FigJam for quick, focused sessions.
Workshop and Facilitation Features
This is Miro’s strongest differentiator. Miro includes native facilitation tools: a countdown timer, voting system (dot voting on stickies), presentation mode that walks participants through frames, and attention management (bring everyone to your view). These features make Miro the go-to tool for design sprints, retrospectives, and strategy workshops.
FigJam has added stamps and emoji reactions for lightweight feedback, and you can use community widgets for timers and voting. But it lacks Miro’s structured facilitation flow. Running a full design sprint in FigJam requires more manual coordination.
Winner: Miro for structured workshops and facilitation.
Templates
Miro’s template library is massive — over 2,500 community and official templates covering everything from user story maps to OKR planning to customer journey maps. You can also create and share custom templates within your organization.
FigJam offers around 300+ templates, including brainstorming boards, retrospectives, and wireframing layouts. The quality is solid, and there is strong overlap with common design-team use cases. But the selection is narrower, especially for business strategy and product management templates.
Winner: Miro for template variety.
Design Tool Integration
FigJam’s killer advantage is its native integration with Figma. You can copy and paste design components between Figma and FigJam, link to Figma files directly on the board, and switch between the two tools without leaving the Figma platform. For design teams, this creates a seamless workflow: brainstorm in FigJam, design in Figma, present from either.
Miro integrates with Figma through a plugin, but it is a one-way embed — you can view Figma frames in Miro, but you cannot edit them. Miro also connects with Sketch, Adobe XD, and other design tools, giving it broader (if shallower) design ecosystem support.
Winner: FigJam for Figma-native teams. Miro for multi-tool design teams.
AI Features
Both platforms have invested heavily in AI during 2025-2026. Miro AI can summarize boards, cluster sticky notes by theme, generate content from prompts, and create diagrams from text descriptions. It works across the entire canvas and helps distill large brainstorming sessions into actionable insights.
FigJam’s AI features lean into Figma’s design DNA. AI can auto-organize stickies, generate visual layouts, suggest connections between ideas, and summarize content. The Figma AI integration means FigJam benefits from the same AI engine powering Figma’s design suggestions.
Winner: Tie. Both offer strong AI capabilities with slightly different strengths.
Integrations
Miro connects with 100+ tools: Jira, Asana, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Workspace, Notion, Confluence, and more. It also has an open API and a marketplace for third-party apps. For teams that need a whiteboard at the center of their tool stack, Miro plays well with everything.
FigJam integrates primarily within the Figma ecosystem, plus Jira, Asana, and a few other tools via widgets. The integration library is smaller, but for teams already consolidated on Figma, it covers the essentials.
Winner: Miro for broad integrations.
Pricing Comparison
| Plan | Miro | FigJam |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 3 boards, unlimited members | Unlimited boards (Figma free users) |
| Starter | $8/member/mo | $3/editor/mo (standalone) |
| Business | $16/member/mo | Included with Figma Organization |
| Enterprise | $20/member/mo (custom) | Custom (via Figma Enterprise) |
FigJam is significantly cheaper at every tier. If your team already pays for Figma, FigJam is effectively included at no extra cost. This makes FigJam an almost irresistible choice for design teams that are already committed to Figma.
Miro’s pricing is higher, but you get a more powerful tool. For organizations where whiteboarding is a core activity (strategy consulting, design agencies, product teams running regular workshops), the premium is justified.
Who Should Choose What
Choose Miro if:
- You run structured workshops, design sprints, or retrospectives regularly
- Your team includes non-designers (product managers, strategists, executives)
- You need deep integrations with project management and communication tools
- Template variety matters — you want a library that covers every use case
- Built-in video chat and facilitation tools reduce your need for Zoom
Choose FigJam if:
- Your team already uses Figma for design work
- You want seamless copy-paste between whiteboard and design files
- Budget is a concern — FigJam is free or very cheap for Figma users
- Your whiteboarding needs are lightweight (brainstorms, quick diagrams, feedback)
- You prefer a simpler tool over a feature-rich platform
The Verdict
Miro is the best standalone whiteboard tool in 2026. It has the deepest feature set for facilitation, the largest template library, and the broadest integration ecosystem. If whiteboarding is central to how your team works, Miro earns its price.
FigJam is the best whiteboard for design teams already on Figma. The native integration is seamless, the price is right (often free), and it covers the most common whiteboarding use cases without the complexity of Miro. For teams that just need a quick space to brainstorm and sketch, FigJam delivers without overhead.
The decision often comes down to one question: does your team already pay for Figma? If yes, start with FigJam. If your whiteboarding needs outgrow it, Miro is there.