Teamwork
Toggl Track
| Feature | Teamwork | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $13.99/mo | Free / from $9/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 |
| Best For | agencies, professional-services, client-work-teams, project-managers | freelancers, agencies, consultants, remote-teams |
| Founded | 2007 | 2006 |
| Task Management | ✓ | ✗ |
| Time Tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Resource Management | ✓ | ✗ |
| Billing Invoicing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Gantt Charts | ✓ | ✗ |
| Project Templates | ✓ | ✗ |
| Reporting | ✗ | ✓ |
| Project Tracking | ✗ | ✓ |
| Team Management | ✗ | ✓ |
| Integrations | ✗ | ✓ |
| Calendar | ✗ | ✓ |
| Pomodoro | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Teamwork Pros
- Excellent for client-facing work
- Built-in time tracking and billing
- Unlimited free client users
- Comprehensive project templates
✗ Teamwork Cons
- Interface can feel cluttered
- Learning curve for full feature set
- Mobile app has limited features
✓ Toggl Track Pros
- One-click timer start
- Works across all devices
- Detailed reporting and analytics
- 100+ integrations
✗ Toggl Track Cons
- Free plan limited to 5 users
- No invoicing built-in
- Project management features are basic
The Verdict
Teamwork is built for agencies and professional services, with a focus on task-management and time-tracking. Toggl Track targets freelancers and agencies and leads with time-tracking and reporting.
Pricing is close: Toggl Track starts at $9/mo versus $13.99/mo for Teamwork — not a deciding factor on its own.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Feature-wise, Toggl Track offers broader built-in capabilities (7 features vs 6), while Teamwork takes a more focused approach — which can mean a simpler, faster onboarding experience.
Both tools are a solid fit for agencies — in those cases, the decision often comes down to workflow style and how your team prefers to organize work.
Bottom line: Toggl Track has a slight overall edge — but if excellent for client-facing work matters most to you, Teamwork may still be the right call.