OutSystems
Relevance AI
| Feature | OutSystems | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free only | Free / from $199/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Best For | enterprises, it-departments, digital-transformation, large-organizations | operations-teams, sales-teams, agencies, business-analysts |
| Founded | 2001 | 2020 |
| Visual Development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Ai Assistant | ✓ | ✗ |
| Full Stack | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cloud Native | ✓ | ✗ |
| Devops Built In | ✓ | ✗ |
| Security Compliance | ✓ | ✗ |
| Integration Hub | ✓ | ✗ |
| Agent Builder | ✗ | ✓ |
| Tool Steps | ✗ | ✓ |
| Knowledge Base | ✗ | ✓ |
| Scheduling | ✗ | ✓ |
| Integrations | ✗ | ✓ |
| Analytics | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ OutSystems Pros
- Enterprise-grade security and compliance
- Full-stack development with visual tools
- AI-powered development assistant (AI Mentor)
- Strong performance and scalability
✗ OutSystems Cons
- Expensive enterprise pricing
- Vendor lock-in concerns
- Requires training to use effectively
✓ Relevance AI Pros
- No-code agent builder
- Pre-built agent templates
- Multi-step tool chains
- Team management for AI agents
✗ Relevance AI Cons
- Expensive for heavy usage
- Complex agents need iteration
- Limited LLM provider choices
The Verdict
OutSystems is built for enterprises and it departments, with a focus on visual-development and ai-assistant. Relevance AI targets operations teams and sales teams and leads with agent-builder and tool-steps.
OutSystems uses custom enterprise pricing, while Relevance AI starts at $199/mo — a tangible advantage for teams with a fixed budget.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Feature-wise, OutSystems offers broader built-in capabilities (7 features vs 6), while Relevance AI takes a more focused approach — which can mean a simpler, faster onboarding experience.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.