Make
OutSystems
| Feature | Make | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $10.59/mo | Free only |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Best For | power-users, agencies, developers, small-businesses | enterprises, it-departments, digital-transformation, large-organizations |
| Founded | 2012 | 2001 |
| Scenarios | ✓ | ✗ |
| Modules | ✓ | ✗ |
| Routers | ✓ | ✗ |
| Webhooks | ✓ | ✗ |
| Data Stores | ✓ | ✗ |
| Api | ✓ | ✗ |
| Visual Development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Ai Assistant | ✗ | ✓ |
| Full Stack | ✗ | ✓ |
| Cloud Native | ✗ | ✓ |
| Devops Built In | ✗ | ✓ |
| Security Compliance | ✗ | ✓ |
| Integration Hub | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Make Pros
- Visual workflow builder
- Affordable pricing
- 1,000+ app integrations
- Complex branching logic
✗ Make Cons
- Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- Smaller app library
- Can be slow with large scenarios
✓ OutSystems Pros
- Enterprise-grade security and compliance
- Full-stack development with visual tools
- AI-powered development assistant (AI Mentor)
- Strong performance and scalability
✗ OutSystems Cons
- Expensive enterprise pricing
- Vendor lock-in concerns
- Requires training to use effectively
The Verdict
Make is built for power users and agencies, with a focus on scenarios and modules. OutSystems targets enterprises and it departments and leads with visual-development and ai-assistant.
OutSystems uses custom enterprise pricing, while Make starts at $10.59/mo — a tangible advantage for teams with a fixed budget.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Feature-wise, OutSystems offers broader built-in capabilities (7 features vs 6), while Make takes a more focused approach — which can mean a simpler, faster onboarding experience.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.
