Microsoft Teams
Zoom
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $4/mo | Free / from $13.33/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Best For | enterprise, teams, microsoft-users, remote-workers | businesses, educators, remote-teams, enterprise |
| Founded | 2017 | 2011 |
| Chat | ✓ | ✗ |
| Video Meetings | ✓ | ✓ |
| Channels | ✓ | ✗ |
| File Sharing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Apps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Whiteboard | ✓ | ✓ |
| Screen Sharing | ✗ | ✓ |
| Breakout Rooms | ✗ | ✓ |
| Recording | ✗ | ✓ |
| Webinars | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Microsoft Teams Pros
- Included with Microsoft 365
- Great video calling
- Deep Office integration
- Large meeting capacity
✗ Microsoft Teams Cons
- Resource heavy
- Complex admin settings
- Can feel cluttered
- Requires Microsoft ecosystem
✓ Zoom Pros
- Reliable video quality
- Easy to use
- Large meeting capacity
- Many integrations
✗ Zoom Cons
- Meeting time limits on free
- Security concerns history
- Zoom fatigue
The Verdict
Microsoft Teams is built for enterprise and teams, with a focus on chat and video-meetings. Zoom targets businesses and educators and leads with video-meetings and screen-sharing.
On pricing, Microsoft Teams is the clear winner for budget-conscious users — starting at $4/mo compared to $13.33/mo for Zoom. That $9.33/mo difference adds up quickly for growing teams.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Both tools are a solid fit for enterprise — in those cases, the decision often comes down to workflow style and how your team prefers to organize work.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.