Mailchimp
Rows
| Feature | Rows | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $13/mo | Free / from $59/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Best For | small-businesses, startups, solopreneurs, e-commerce | data-analysts, marketers, startups, growth-teams |
| Founded | 2001 | 2016 |
| Email Campaigns | ✓ | ✗ |
| Automation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Landing Pages | ✓ | ✗ |
| Audience Segments | ✓ | ✗ |
| Analytics | ✓ | ✗ |
| Templates | ✓ | ✓ |
| A B Testing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Integrations | ✗ | ✓ |
| Ai Assistant | ✗ | ✓ |
| Charts | ✗ | ✓ |
| Sharing | ✗ | ✓ |
| Api Connections | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Mailchimp Pros
- Free tier for up to 500 contacts
- Easy drag-and-drop email builder
- Built-in automation workflows
- Good reporting and analytics
✗ Mailchimp Cons
- Gets expensive as list grows
- Automation less powerful than competitors
- Limited A/B testing on lower plans
✓ Rows Pros
- Built-in data integrations
- Modern clean interface
- Powerful AI features
- Great for data analysis
✗ Rows Cons
- Limited free plan
- Smaller community
- Some integrations require paid plan
The Verdict
Mailchimp is built for small businesses and startups, with a focus on email-campaigns and automation. Rows targets data analysts and marketers and leads with integrations and ai-assistant.
On pricing, Mailchimp is the clear winner for budget-conscious users — starting at $13/mo compared to $59/mo for Rows. That $46/mo difference adds up quickly for growing teams.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Feature-wise, Mailchimp offers broader built-in capabilities (7 features vs 6), while Rows takes a more focused approach — which can mean a simpler, faster onboarding experience.
Both tools are a solid fit for startups — in those cases, the decision often comes down to workflow style and how your team prefers to organize work.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.