Hubstaff

★★★★ 4.3
VS
Loom icon

Loom

★★★★★ 4.5
Feature Hubstaff Loom
Pricing From $4.99/mo Free / from $12.5/mo
Free Plan ✗ No ✓ Yes
Rating 4.3 / 5 4.5 / 5
Best For remote-team-managers, field-service-companies, agencies, construction-teams remote-teams, developers, customer-success, managers, educators
Founded 2012 2015
Time Tracking
Gps Tracking
Screenshots
Activity Levels
Payroll
Geofencing
Screen Recording
Video Messages
Transcription
Reactions
Video Editing
Analytics

✓ Hubstaff Pros

  • GPS and location tracking for field teams
  • Automated payroll from tracked hours
  • Activity level monitoring
  • Geofencing for job sites

✗ Hubstaff Cons

  • Can feel invasive to employees
  • Screenshot feature raises privacy concerns
  • No free plan available

✓ Loom Pros

  • Instant async video communication
  • Screen + webcam recording
  • Auto-transcription and captions
  • Slack and Notion integration

✗ Loom Cons

  • 25-video limit on free plan
  • 5-minute recording limit on free
  • Requires good internet for fast uploads

The Verdict

Hubstaff is built for remote team managers and field service companies, with a focus on time-tracking and gps-tracking. Loom targets remote teams and developers and leads with screen-recording and video-messages.

On pricing, Hubstaff is the clear winner for budget-conscious users — starting at $4.99/mo compared to $12.5/mo for Loom. That $7.51/mo difference adds up quickly for growing teams.

Loom has a free plan, which gives it a meaningful edge for individuals and small teams exploring their options. Hubstaff requires a paid subscription from day one.

This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.

Related Comparisons

Stay ahead of AI — Weekly tool picks, straight to your inbox.

Join thousands of professionals who get curated AI tool recommendations every week. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.