Hubstaff
Lever
| Feature | Hubstaff | Lever |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | From $4.99/mo | Contact sales |
| Free Plan | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Best For | remote-team-managers, field-service-companies, agencies, construction-teams | tech-companies, growing-companies, talent-teams, recruiters |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
| Time Tracking | ✓ | ✗ |
| Gps Tracking | ✓ | ✗ |
| Screenshots | ✓ | ✗ |
| Activity Levels | ✓ | ✗ |
| Payroll | ✓ | ✗ |
| Geofencing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Ats | ✗ | ✓ |
| Talent Crm | ✗ | ✓ |
| Nurture Campaigns | ✗ | ✓ |
| Interview Scheduling | ✗ | ✓ |
| Analytics | ✗ | ✓ |
| Integrations | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Hubstaff Pros
- GPS and location tracking for field teams
- Automated payroll from tracked hours
- Activity level monitoring
- Geofencing for job sites
✗ Hubstaff Cons
- Can feel invasive to employees
- Screenshot feature raises privacy concerns
- No free plan available
✓ Lever Pros
- Combined ATS + CRM
- Great candidate experience
- Nurture campaigns
- Clean UI
✗ Lever Cons
- Expensive
- Limited reporting
- Customization constraints
The Verdict
Hubstaff is built for remote team managers and field service companies, with a focus on time-tracking and gps-tracking. Lever targets tech companies and growing companies and leads with ats and talent-crm.
Lever uses custom enterprise pricing, while Hubstaff starts at $4.99/mo — a tangible advantage for teams with a fixed budget.
Neither tool offers a free plan, so factor the subscription cost into your decision from the start.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.