BambooHR
Greenhouse
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free Plan | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Best For | smbs, hr-teams, growing-companies, people-operations | mid-size-companies, enterprise, hr-teams, talent-teams |
| Founded | 2008 | 2012 |
| Employee Database | ✓ | ✗ |
| Ats | ✓ | ✓ |
| Onboarding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Time Off Tracking | ✓ | ✗ |
| Performance Reviews | ✓ | ✗ |
| Reporting | ✓ | ✗ |
| Employee Satisfaction | ✓ | ✗ |
| Structured Interviews | ✗ | ✓ |
| Dei Tools | ✗ | ✓ |
| Analytics | ✗ | ✓ |
| Integrations | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ BambooHR Pros
- Beautiful and intuitive interface for HR teams
- Excellent employee self-service portal
- Built-in ATS for recruitment
- Strong performance management features
✗ BambooHR Cons
- Pricing not transparent (quote required)
- Limited payroll features (US only)
- Fewer integrations than enterprise HRIS
✓ Greenhouse Pros
- Structured hiring
- DEI features
- Great integrations
- Detailed analytics
✗ Greenhouse Cons
- Expensive
- Complex setup
- Overkill for small companies
The Verdict
BambooHR is built for smbs and hr teams, with a focus on employee-database and ats. Greenhouse targets mid size companies and enterprise and leads with ats and structured-interviews.
Both tools use custom enterprise pricing — you'll need to contact sales for a quote, which makes direct cost comparison difficult.
Neither tool offers a free plan, so factor the subscription cost into your decision from the start.
Feature-wise, BambooHR offers broader built-in capabilities (7 features vs 6), while Greenhouse takes a more focused approach — which can mean a simpler, faster onboarding experience.
Both tools are a solid fit for hr teams — in those cases, the decision often comes down to workflow style and how your team prefers to organize work.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.