Trigger.dev
Windmill
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $0/mo | Free / from $10/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Best For | typescript-developers, saas-apps, background-processing, serverless-teams | developers, devops-teams, internal-tools, data-pipelines |
| Founded | 2022 | 2022 |
| Background Jobs | ✓ | ✗ |
| Scheduled Tasks | ✓ | ✗ |
| Event Triggers | ✓ | ✗ |
| Retries | ✓ | ✗ |
| Observability | ✓ | ✗ |
| Concurrency Control | ✓ | ✗ |
| Self Hostable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Workflow Editor | ✗ | ✓ |
| Script To Ui | ✗ | ✓ |
| Scheduling | ✗ | ✓ |
| Approval Flows | ✗ | ✓ |
| Multi Language | ✗ | ✓ |
| Audit Logs | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Trigger.dev Pros
- Write background jobs in TypeScript (not YAML/config)
- Built-in retries, queues, and concurrency controls
- Excellent developer experience with type safety
- Open-source with self-hosting option
✗ Trigger.dev Cons
- TypeScript only (no Python/Go support)
- Cloud pricing based on compute time
- Newer platform with evolving API
✓ Windmill Pros
- Open-source and self-hostable
- Supports Python, TypeScript, Go, Bash, SQL natively
- Auto-generates UI from script parameters
- Excellent scheduling and workflow orchestration
✗ Windmill Cons
- Smaller community than Zapier/n8n
- Self-hosting requires infrastructure knowledge
- Less polished documentation for beginners
The Verdict
Trigger.dev is built for typescript developers and saas apps, with a focus on background-jobs and scheduled-tasks. Windmill targets developers and devops teams and leads with workflow-editor and script-to-ui.
On pricing, Trigger.dev is the clear winner for budget-conscious users — starting at $0/mo compared to $10/mo for Windmill. That $10/mo difference adds up quickly for growing teams.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.