TimeCamp
Toggl Track
| Feature | TimeCamp | Toggl Track |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $3.99/mo | Free / from $9/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 |
| Best For | freelancers, agencies, remote-teams, consultants | freelancers, agencies, consultants, remote-teams |
| Founded | 2009 | 2006 |
| Automatic Tracking | ✓ | ✗ |
| Timesheets | ✓ | ✗ |
| Invoicing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Attendance | ✓ | ✗ |
| Productivity Monitoring | ✓ | ✗ |
| Project Budgeting | ✓ | ✗ |
| Time Tracking | ✗ | ✓ |
| Reporting | ✗ | ✓ |
| Project Tracking | ✗ | ✓ |
| Team Management | ✗ | ✓ |
| Integrations | ✗ | ✓ |
| Calendar | ✗ | ✓ |
| Pomodoro | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ TimeCamp Pros
- Automatic tracking
- Good free plan
- Invoicing built-in
- Many integrations
✗ TimeCamp Cons
- UI feels dated
- Mobile app inconsistent
- Learning curve for reports
✓ Toggl Track Pros
- One-click timer start
- Works across all devices
- Detailed reporting and analytics
- 100+ integrations
✗ Toggl Track Cons
- Free plan limited to 5 users
- No invoicing built-in
- Project management features are basic
The Verdict
TimeCamp is built for freelancers and agencies, with a focus on automatic-tracking and timesheets. Toggl Track targets freelancers and agencies and leads with time-tracking and reporting.
On pricing, TimeCamp is the clear winner for budget-conscious users — starting at $3.99/mo compared to $9/mo for Toggl Track. That $5.01/mo difference adds up quickly for growing teams.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Feature-wise, Toggl Track offers broader built-in capabilities (7 features vs 6), while TimeCamp takes a more focused approach — which can mean a simpler, faster onboarding experience.
Both tools are a solid fit for freelancers, agencies, remote teams — in those cases, the decision often comes down to workflow style and how your team prefers to organize work.
Bottom line: Toggl Track has a slight overall edge — but if automatic tracking matters most to you, TimeCamp may still be the right call.