Superhuman
Timing
| Feature | Timing | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | From $25/mo | From $8/mo |
| Free Plan | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| Rating | 4.6 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 |
| Best For | executives, sales-professionals, founders, high-volume-emailers | mac-users, freelancers, consultants, lawyers |
| Founded | 2014 | 2013 |
| Keyboard Shortcuts | ✓ | ✗ |
| Ai Triage | ✓ | ✗ |
| Read Statuses | ✓ | ✗ |
| Split Inbox | ✓ | ✗ |
| Snippets | ✓ | ✗ |
| Scheduled Send | ✓ | ✗ |
| Undo Send | ✓ | ✗ |
| Automatic Tracking | ✗ | ✓ |
| Ai Categorization | ✗ | ✓ |
| Timeline View | ✗ | ✓ |
| Project Rules | ✗ | ✓ |
| Calendar Sync | ✗ | ✓ |
| Reporting | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Superhuman Pros
- Fastest email client with sub-100ms interactions
- AI triage auto-prioritizes and summarizes emails
- Split inbox and snippets for efficient workflows
- Read statuses show when emails are opened
✗ Superhuman Cons
- Expensive at $25-33/month per user
- No free plan or trial without invite
- Gmail and Outlook only (no other providers)
✓ Timing Pros
- Completely automatic tracking on Mac
- AI-powered activity categorization
- Beautiful timeline visualization
- Syncs with calendar events
✗ Timing Cons
- Mac only - no Windows or Linux
- Requires initial rule setup
- No team/collaboration features in lower plans
The Verdict
Superhuman is built for executives and sales professionals, with a focus on keyboard-shortcuts and ai-triage. Timing targets mac users and freelancers and leads with automatic-tracking and ai-categorization.
On pricing, Timing is the clear winner for budget-conscious users — starting at $8/mo compared to $25/mo for Superhuman. That $17/mo difference adds up quickly for growing teams.
Neither tool offers a free plan, so factor the subscription cost into your decision from the start.
Feature-wise, Superhuman offers broader built-in capabilities (7 features vs 6), while Timing takes a more focused approach — which can mean a simpler, faster onboarding experience.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.