SentinelOne
Tines
| Feature | SentinelOne | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Contact sales | Free only |
| Free Plan | ✗ No | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Best For | enterprise, security-operations, cloud-companies, regulated-industries | security-teams, soc-analysts, incident-responders, security-engineers |
| Founded | 2013 | 2018 |
| Edr | ✓ | ✗ |
| Xdr | ✓ | ✗ |
| Ai Threat Detection | ✓ | ✗ |
| Automated Response | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cloud Security | ✓ | ✗ |
| Identity Security | ✓ | ✗ |
| Workflow Automation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Alert Triage | ✗ | ✓ |
| Incident Response | ✗ | ✓ |
| Case Management | ✗ | ✓ |
| Integrations | ✗ | ✓ |
| Templates | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ SentinelOne Pros
- Autonomous response
- AI-powered
- Low false positives
- Cloud workload protection
✗ SentinelOne Cons
- Expensive
- Complex deployment
- Resource intensive
✓ Tines Pros
- No-code workflow builder
- Security-focused templates
- Generous free tier
- Fast implementation
✗ Tines Cons
- Security-focused (not general automation)
- Smaller community
- Limited non-security integrations
The Verdict
SentinelOne is built for enterprise and security operations, with a focus on edr and xdr. Tines targets security teams and soc analysts and leads with workflow-automation and alert-triage.
Both tools use custom enterprise pricing — you'll need to contact sales for a quote, which makes direct cost comparison difficult.
Tines has a free plan, which gives it a meaningful edge for individuals and small teams exploring their options. SentinelOne requires a paid subscription from day one.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.