Semaphore
Tines
| Feature | Semaphore | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $10/mo | Free only |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Best For | development-teams, open-source-projects, startups, monorepo-users | security-teams, soc-analysts, incident-responders, security-engineers |
| Founded | 2012 | 2018 |
| Parallel Pipelines | ✓ | ✗ |
| Test Reports | ✓ | ✗ |
| Secrets Management | ✓ | ✗ |
| Docker Support | ✓ | ✗ |
| Caching | ✓ | ✗ |
| Notifications | ✓ | ✗ |
| Workflow Automation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Alert Triage | ✗ | ✓ |
| Incident Response | ✗ | ✓ |
| Case Management | ✗ | ✓ |
| Integrations | ✗ | ✓ |
| Templates | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Semaphore Pros
- Extremely fast build times
- Generous free tier for open source
- Easy YAML-based configuration
- Built-in secrets management
✗ Semaphore Cons
- Smaller community than GitHub Actions
- Limited marketplace for pre-built steps
- Debugging failed builds can be tricky
✓ Tines Pros
- No-code workflow builder
- Security-focused templates
- Generous free tier
- Fast implementation
✗ Tines Cons
- Security-focused (not general automation)
- Smaller community
- Limited non-security integrations
The Verdict
Semaphore is built for development teams and open source projects, with a focus on parallel-pipelines and test-reports. Tines targets security teams and soc analysts and leads with workflow-automation and alert-triage.
Tines uses custom enterprise pricing, while Semaphore starts at $10/mo — a tangible advantage for teams with a fixed budget.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.