Semaphore
Sourcegraph
| Feature | Semaphore | Sourcegraph |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $10/mo | Free / from $9/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Best For | development-teams, open-source-projects, startups, monorepo-users | engineering-teams, enterprises, open-source-maintainers, platform-engineers |
| Founded | 2012 | 2013 |
| Parallel Pipelines | ✓ | ✗ |
| Test Reports | ✓ | ✗ |
| Secrets Management | ✓ | ✗ |
| Docker Support | ✓ | ✗ |
| Caching | ✓ | ✗ |
| Notifications | ✓ | ✗ |
| Code Search | ✗ | ✓ |
| Code Navigation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Batch Changes | ✗ | ✓ |
| Ai Assistant | ✗ | ✓ |
| Code Insights | ✗ | ✓ |
| Notebooks | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Semaphore Pros
- Extremely fast build times
- Generous free tier for open source
- Easy YAML-based configuration
- Built-in secrets management
✗ Semaphore Cons
- Smaller community than GitHub Actions
- Limited marketplace for pre-built steps
- Debugging failed builds can be tricky
✓ Sourcegraph Pros
- Search across all repositories
- Excellent code navigation
- Batch Changes for mass refactoring
- Cody AI assistant
✗ Sourcegraph Cons
- Complex self-hosted setup
- Expensive for enterprise
- Learning curve for advanced features
The Verdict
Semaphore is built for development teams and open source projects, with a focus on parallel-pipelines and test-reports. Sourcegraph targets engineering teams and enterprises and leads with code-search and code-navigation.
Pricing is close: Sourcegraph starts at $9/mo versus $10/mo for Semaphore — not a deciding factor on its own.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.