PagerDuty
Sourcegraph
| Feature | PagerDuty | Sourcegraph |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $21/mo | Free / from $9/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Best For | devops-engineers, sre-teams, on-call-teams, enterprise | engineering-teams, enterprises, open-source-maintainers, platform-engineers |
| Founded | 2009 | 2013 |
| Incident Management | ✓ | ✗ |
| On Call Scheduling | ✓ | ✗ |
| Escalation Policies | ✓ | ✗ |
| Event Intelligence | ✓ | ✗ |
| Automation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Status Pages | ✓ | ✗ |
| Code Search | ✗ | ✓ |
| Code Navigation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Batch Changes | ✗ | ✓ |
| Ai Assistant | ✗ | ✓ |
| Code Insights | ✗ | ✓ |
| Notebooks | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ PagerDuty Pros
- Reliable alerting
- Great escalation policies
- Many integrations
- AIOps capabilities
✗ PagerDuty Cons
- Expensive at scale
- Complex rule setup
- Can be noisy
✓ Sourcegraph Pros
- Search across all repositories
- Excellent code navigation
- Batch Changes for mass refactoring
- Cody AI assistant
✗ Sourcegraph Cons
- Complex self-hosted setup
- Expensive for enterprise
- Learning curve for advanced features
The Verdict
PagerDuty is built for devops engineers and sre teams, with a focus on incident-management and on-call-scheduling. Sourcegraph targets engineering teams and enterprises and leads with code-search and code-navigation.
On pricing, Sourcegraph is the clear winner for budget-conscious users — starting at $9/mo compared to $21/mo for PagerDuty. That $12/mo difference adds up quickly for growing teams.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.