Obsidian
Tana
| Feature | Tana | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $4/mo | Free / from $12/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.7 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Best For | researchers, writers, developers, knowledge-workers | power-users, researchers, knowledge-workers, systems-thinkers |
| Founded | 2020 | 2020 |
| Markdown | ✓ | ✗ |
| Backlinks | ✓ | ✗ |
| Graph View | ✓ | ✗ |
| Plugins | ✓ | ✗ |
| Themes | ✓ | ✗ |
| Canvas | ✓ | ✗ |
| Supertags | ✗ | ✓ |
| Ai Commands | ✗ | ✓ |
| Live Queries | ✗ | ✓ |
| Views | ✗ | ✓ |
| Node Graph | ✗ | ✓ |
| Daily Notes | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Obsidian Pros
- 100% offline
- Local-first
- Plugin ecosystem
- Graph view
- Free for personal use
✗ Obsidian Cons
- No real-time collaboration
- Steep learning curve
- Mobile app is basic
✓ Tana Pros
- Supertags create structured data effortlessly
- Powerful AI-powered search and commands
- Everything is queryable and linked
- Flexible views (table, board, calendar)
✗ Tana Cons
- Steep learning curve
- No mobile app yet
- Still in development (features changing)
The Verdict
Obsidian is built for researchers and writers, with a focus on markdown and backlinks. Tana targets power users and researchers and leads with supertags and ai-commands.
On pricing, Obsidian is the clear winner for budget-conscious users — starting at $4/mo compared to $12/mo for Tana. That $8/mo difference adds up quickly for growing teams.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Obsidian edges out on user ratings (4.7 vs 4.3). While both are well-regarded, that gap reflects real differences in user satisfaction worth considering.
Both tools are a solid fit for researchers, knowledge workers — in those cases, the decision often comes down to workflow style and how your team prefers to organize work.
Bottom line: Obsidian has a slight overall edge — but if supertags create structured data effortlessly matters most to you, Tana may still be the right call.