Missive
Rocket.Chat
| Feature | Missive | Rocket.Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $14/mo | Free / from $4/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Best For | agencies, startups, support-teams, remote-teams | security-conscious-organizations, government, self-hosters, enterprises |
| Founded | 2015 | 2015 |
| Shared Inboxes | ✓ | ✗ |
| Team Chat | ✓ | ✗ |
| Collaborative Writing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Assignments | ✓ | ✗ |
| Labels | ✓ | ✗ |
| Integrations | ✓ | ✗ |
| Channels | ✗ | ✓ |
| Direct Messaging | ✗ | ✓ |
| Video Calls | ✗ | ✓ |
| Federation | ✗ | ✓ |
| E2e Encryption | ✗ | ✓ |
| Marketplace | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Missive Pros
- Elegant interface
- Team collaboration
- Multi-channel
- Good integrations
✗ Missive Cons
- Learning curve
- Smaller ecosystem
- Limited automation
✓ Rocket.Chat Pros
- Fully open-source and self-hostable
- End-to-end encryption
- Federation support between instances
- Highly customizable
✗ Rocket.Chat Cons
- Self-hosted requires maintenance
- Mobile apps less polished than Slack
- Smaller app ecosystem
The Verdict
Missive is built for agencies and startups, with a focus on shared-inboxes and team-chat. Rocket.Chat targets security conscious organizations and government and leads with channels and direct-messaging.
On pricing, Rocket.Chat is the clear winner for budget-conscious users — starting at $4/mo compared to $14/mo for Missive. That $10/mo difference adds up quickly for growing teams.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Missive edges out on user ratings (4.5 vs 4.1). While both are well-regarded, that gap reflects real differences in user satisfaction worth considering.
Bottom line: Missive has a slight overall edge — but if fully open-source and self-hostable matters most to you, Rocket.Chat may still be the right call.