Miro
Webflow
| Feature | Miro | Webflow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $8/mo | Free / from $14/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Best For | designers, product-teams, remote-teams, facilitators | web-designers, agencies, freelancers, marketing-teams |
| Founded | 2011 | 2013 |
| Whiteboard | ✓ | ✗ |
| Templates | ✓ | ✗ |
| Voting | ✓ | ✗ |
| Timer | ✓ | ✗ |
| Integrations | ✓ | ✗ |
| Video Chat | ✓ | ✗ |
| Visual Editor | ✗ | ✓ |
| Cms | ✗ | ✓ |
| Ecommerce | ✗ | ✓ |
| Interactions | ✗ | ✓ |
| Seo | ✗ | ✓ |
| Hosting | ✗ | ✓ |
| Responsive Design | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Miro Pros
- Infinite canvas
- Great for workshops
- Templates
- Integrations
✗ Miro Cons
- Can be slow with large boards
- Free plan limited
- Learning curve
✓ Webflow Pros
- Full design control like writing CSS
- Clean semantic code output
- Powerful CMS for dynamic content
- Excellent interactions and animations
✗ Webflow Cons
- Steep learning curve — need CSS knowledge
- Expensive for multiple sites
- E-commerce limited compared to Shopify
The Verdict
Miro is built for designers and product teams, with a focus on whiteboard and templates. Webflow targets web designers and agencies and leads with visual-editor and cms.
On pricing, Miro is the clear winner for budget-conscious users — starting at $8/mo compared to $14/mo for Webflow. That $6/mo difference adds up quickly for growing teams.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Feature-wise, Webflow offers broader built-in capabilities (7 features vs 6), while Miro takes a more focused approach — which can mean a simpler, faster onboarding experience.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.
