Miro
Stormboard
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $8/mo | Free / from $10/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Best For | designers, product-teams, remote-teams, facilitators | facilitators, meeting-leaders, teams, consultants |
| Founded | 2011 | 2011 |
| Whiteboard | ✓ | ✗ |
| Templates | ✓ | ✓ |
| Voting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Timer | ✓ | ✗ |
| Integrations | ✓ | ✓ |
| Video Chat | ✓ | ✗ |
| Sticky Notes | ✗ | ✓ |
| Ai Reports | ✗ | ✓ |
| Video Conferencing | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Miro Pros
- Infinite canvas
- Great for workshops
- Templates
- Integrations
✗ Miro Cons
- Can be slow with large boards
- Free plan limited
- Learning curve
✓ Stormboard Pros
- Good for brainstorming
- Meeting templates
- AI report generation
- Easy to use
✗ Stormboard Cons
- Limited free tier
- Less polished than Miro
- Fewer integrations
The Verdict
Miro is built for designers and product teams, with a focus on whiteboard and templates. Stormboard targets facilitators and meeting leaders and leads with sticky-notes and templates.
Pricing is close: Miro starts at $8/mo versus $10/mo for Stormboard — not a deciding factor on its own.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Miro edges out on user ratings (4.5 vs 4.1). While both are well-regarded, that gap reflects real differences in user satisfaction worth considering.
Both tools are a solid fit for facilitators — in those cases, the decision often comes down to workflow style and how your team prefers to organize work.
Bottom line: Miro has a slight overall edge — but if good for brainstorming matters most to you, Stormboard may still be the right call.