Miro
Microsoft SharePoint
| Feature | Miro | Microsoft SharePoint |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $8/mo | From $5/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Best For | designers, product-teams, remote-teams, facilitators | enterprise, large-organizations, it-departments, microsoft-users |
| Founded | 2011 | 2001 |
| Whiteboard | ✓ | ✗ |
| Templates | ✓ | ✗ |
| Voting | ✓ | ✗ |
| Timer | ✓ | ✗ |
| Integrations | ✓ | ✗ |
| Video Chat | ✓ | ✗ |
| Document Management | ✗ | ✓ |
| Team Sites | ✗ | ✓ |
| Intranet | ✗ | ✓ |
| Workflows | ✗ | ✓ |
| Search | ✗ | ✓ |
| Compliance | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Miro Pros
- Infinite canvas
- Great for workshops
- Templates
- Integrations
✗ Miro Cons
- Can be slow with large boards
- Free plan limited
- Learning curve
✓ Microsoft SharePoint Pros
- Enterprise-grade
- Deep M365 integration
- Customizable sites
- Version control
✗ Microsoft SharePoint Cons
- Complex setup
- Requires admin expertise
- Can be slow
The Verdict
Miro is built for designers and product teams, with a focus on whiteboard and templates. Microsoft SharePoint targets enterprise and large organizations and leads with document-management and team-sites.
Pricing is close: Microsoft SharePoint starts at $5/mo versus $8/mo for Miro — not a deciding factor on its own.
Miro has a free plan, which gives it a meaningful edge for individuals and small teams exploring their options. Microsoft SharePoint requires a paid subscription from day one.
Miro edges out on user ratings (4.5 vs 4.1). While both are well-regarded, that gap reflects real differences in user satisfaction worth considering.
Bottom line: Miro has a slight overall edge — but if enterprise-grade matters most to you, Microsoft SharePoint may still be the right call.
