Miro
Rocket.Chat
| Feature | Miro | Rocket.Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $8/mo | Free / from $4/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Best For | designers, product-teams, remote-teams, facilitators | developers, self-hosted-teams, enterprises, customer-support-teams |
| Founded | 2011 | 2015 |
| Whiteboard | ✓ | ✗ |
| Templates | ✓ | ✗ |
| Voting | ✓ | ✗ |
| Timer | ✓ | ✗ |
| Integrations | ✓ | ✗ |
| Video Chat | ✓ | ✗ |
| Channels | ✗ | ✓ |
| Direct Messaging | ✗ | ✓ |
| Video Conferencing | ✗ | ✓ |
| Omnichannel | ✗ | ✓ |
| Marketplace | ✗ | ✓ |
| Federation | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Miro Pros
- Infinite canvas
- Great for workshops
- Templates
- Integrations
✗ Miro Cons
- Can be slow with large boards
- Free plan limited
- Learning curve
✓ Rocket.Chat Pros
- Fully open-source
- Self-hosted option
- Omnichannel customer support
- Highly customizable
✗ Rocket.Chat Cons
- Requires server resources to self-host
- Less polished than Slack
- Plugin quality varies
The Verdict
Miro is built for designers and product teams, with a focus on whiteboard and templates. Rocket.Chat targets developers and self hosted teams and leads with channels and direct-messaging.
Pricing is close: Rocket.Chat starts at $4/mo versus $8/mo for Miro — not a deciding factor on its own.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Miro edges out on user ratings (4.5 vs 4.1). While both are well-regarded, that gap reflects real differences in user satisfaction worth considering.
Bottom line: Miro has a slight overall edge — but if fully open-source matters most to you, Rocket.Chat may still be the right call.
