Make
Relevance AI
| Feature | Make | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $10.59/mo | Free / from $199/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Best For | power-users, agencies, developers, small-businesses | operations-teams, sales-teams, agencies, business-analysts |
| Founded | 2012 | 2020 |
| Scenarios | ✓ | ✗ |
| Modules | ✓ | ✗ |
| Routers | ✓ | ✗ |
| Webhooks | ✓ | ✗ |
| Data Stores | ✓ | ✗ |
| Api | ✓ | ✗ |
| Agent Builder | ✗ | ✓ |
| Tool Steps | ✗ | ✓ |
| Knowledge Base | ✗ | ✓ |
| Scheduling | ✗ | ✓ |
| Integrations | ✗ | ✓ |
| Analytics | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Make Pros
- Visual workflow builder
- Affordable pricing
- 1,000+ app integrations
- Complex branching logic
✗ Make Cons
- Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- Smaller app library
- Can be slow with large scenarios
✓ Relevance AI Pros
- No-code agent builder
- Pre-built agent templates
- Multi-step tool chains
- Team management for AI agents
✗ Relevance AI Cons
- Expensive for heavy usage
- Complex agents need iteration
- Limited LLM provider choices
The Verdict
Make is built for power users and agencies, with a focus on scenarios and modules. Relevance AI targets operations teams and sales teams and leads with agent-builder and tool-steps.
On pricing, Make is the clear winner for budget-conscious users — starting at $10.59/mo compared to $199/mo for Relevance AI. That $188.41/mo difference adds up quickly for growing teams.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Both tools are a solid fit for agencies — in those cases, the decision often comes down to workflow style and how your team prefers to organize work.
Bottom line: Make has a slight overall edge — but if no-code agent builder matters most to you, Relevance AI may still be the right call.
