Kong
Windmill
| Feature | Kong | Windmill |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $0.05/mo | Free / from $10/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Best For | platform-engineers, microservices-teams, api-gateway-users, devops-teams | developers, devops-teams, internal-tools, data-pipelines |
| Founded | 2010 | 2022 |
| Api Gateway | ✓ | ✗ |
| Service Mesh | ✓ | ✗ |
| Load Balancing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Authentication | ✓ | ✗ |
| Rate Limiting | ✓ | ✗ |
| Plugins | ✓ | ✗ |
| Observability | ✓ | ✗ |
| Kubernetes Ingress | ✓ | ✗ |
| Workflow Editor | ✗ | ✓ |
| Script To Ui | ✗ | ✓ |
| Scheduling | ✗ | ✓ |
| Approval Flows | ✗ | ✓ |
| Multi Language | ✗ | ✓ |
| Self Hostable | ✗ | ✓ |
| Audit Logs | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Kong Pros
- Open-source core with large plugin ecosystem
- Sub-millisecond latency for API requests
- Platform-agnostic deployment (cloud, on-prem, hybrid)
- Strong Kubernetes-native support
✗ Kong Cons
- Enterprise features require paid license
- Configuration complexity for advanced setups
- Documentation could be more beginner-friendly
✓ Windmill Pros
- Open-source and self-hostable
- Supports Python, TypeScript, Go, Bash, SQL natively
- Auto-generates UI from script parameters
- Excellent scheduling and workflow orchestration
✗ Windmill Cons
- Smaller community than Zapier/n8n
- Self-hosting requires infrastructure knowledge
- Less polished documentation for beginners
The Verdict
Kong is built for platform engineers and microservices teams, with a focus on api-gateway and service-mesh. Windmill targets developers and devops teams and leads with workflow-editor and script-to-ui.
On pricing, Kong is the clear winner for budget-conscious users — starting at $0.05/mo compared to $10/mo for Windmill. That $9.95/mo difference adds up quickly for growing teams.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Feature-wise, Kong offers broader built-in capabilities (8 features vs 7), while Windmill takes a more focused approach — which can mean a simpler, faster onboarding experience.
Both tools are a solid fit for devops teams — in those cases, the decision often comes down to workflow style and how your team prefers to organize work.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.