Jenkins
Slidev
| Feature | Jenkins | Slidev |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free only | Free only |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Best For | enterprise-teams, on-premise-deployments, complex-pipelines, legacy-systems | developers, tech-speakers, educators, open-source-contributors |
| Founded | 2011 | 2021 |
| Pipeline As Code | ✓ | ✗ |
| Plugins | ✓ | ✗ |
| Distributed Builds | ✓ | ✗ |
| Pipeline Visualization | ✓ | ✗ |
| Scm Integration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Artifact Management | ✓ | ✗ |
| Notifications | ✓ | ✗ |
| Markdown Slides | ✗ | ✓ |
| Live Coding | ✗ | ✓ |
| Vue Components | ✗ | ✓ |
| Themes | ✗ | ✓ |
| Recording | ✗ | ✓ |
| Pdf Export | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Jenkins Pros
- Completely free and open source
- Extremely extensible with 1,800+ plugins
- Mature and battle-tested over many years
- Supports any programming language and platform
✗ Jenkins Cons
- Dated UI feels old compared to modern CI tools
- Requires significant maintenance and administration
- Groovy-based Jenkinsfiles have steep learning curve
✓ Slidev Pros
- Write slides in Markdown
- Live coding in presentations
- Full Vue component support
- Export to PDF or SPA
✗ Slidev Cons
- Requires developer knowledge
- No visual editor
- Not suitable for non-technical users
The Verdict
Jenkins is built for enterprise teams and on premise deployments, with a focus on pipeline-as-code and plugins. Slidev targets developers and tech speakers and leads with markdown-slides and live-coding.
Both tools use custom enterprise pricing — you'll need to contact sales for a quote, which makes direct cost comparison difficult.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Feature-wise, Jenkins offers broader built-in capabilities (7 features vs 6), while Slidev takes a more focused approach — which can mean a simpler, faster onboarding experience.
Bottom line: Slidev has a slight overall edge — but if completely free and open source matters most to you, Jenkins may still be the right call.