JazzHR
Workable
| Feature | JazzHR | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | From $75/mo | From $149/mo |
| Free Plan | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Best For | small-businesses, growing-companies, hr-generalists, startup-hiring | growing-companies, hr-teams, recruiters, startups |
| Founded | 2009 | 2012 |
| Applicant Tracking | ✓ | ✗ |
| Job Posting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interview Scheduling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Offer Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reporting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Compliance | ✓ | ✗ |
| Ats | ✗ | ✓ |
| Ai Sourcing | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ JazzHR Pros
- Very affordable ATS
- Easy to set up and use
- Good job board integrations
- Customizable hiring workflows
✗ JazzHR Cons
- Limited reporting
- Basic onboarding features
- Not suitable for enterprise
✓ Workable Pros
- Great job board reach
- AI candidate sourcing
- Easy to use
- Good reporting
✗ Workable Cons
- Expensive
- Limited HR beyond recruiting
- Video interview extra
The Verdict
JazzHR is built for small businesses and growing companies, with a focus on applicant-tracking and job-posting. Workable targets growing companies and hr teams and leads with ats and ai-sourcing.
On pricing, JazzHR is the clear winner for budget-conscious users — starting at $75/mo compared to $149/mo for Workable. That $74/mo difference adds up quickly for growing teams.
Neither tool offers a free plan, so factor the subscription cost into your decision from the start.
Both tools are a solid fit for growing companies — in those cases, the decision often comes down to workflow style and how your team prefers to organize work.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.