Immich
Sentry
| Feature | Immich | Sentry |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $0/mo | Free / from $26/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.7 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Best For | self-hosters, families, privacy-focused-users, photographers | developers, frontend-teams, mobile-developers, startups |
| Founded | 2022 | 2012 |
| Photo Backup | ✓ | ✗ |
| Facial Recognition | ✓ | ✗ |
| Smart Search | ✓ | ✗ |
| Shared Albums | ✓ | ✗ |
| Memories | ✓ | ✗ |
| Map View | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile Apps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Error Tracking | ✗ | ✓ |
| Performance Monitoring | ✗ | ✓ |
| Session Replay | ✗ | ✓ |
| Source Maps | ✗ | ✓ |
| Release Tracking | ✗ | ✓ |
| Alerting | ✗ | ✓ |
| Integrations | ✗ | ✓ |
| Issue Triaging | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Immich Pros
- Full Google Photos replacement (self-hosted)
- AI face recognition and smart search
- Mobile apps with automatic background backup
- Shared albums and partner sharing
✗ Immich Cons
- Self-hosting only (no managed cloud option)
- Resource-intensive (especially ML features)
- Still in active development (breaking changes possible)
✓ Sentry Pros
- Excellent error tracking with full stack traces
- Source map support for minified code
- Session replay shows exactly what users experienced
- Open-source self-hosted option available
- Supports 100+ platforms and frameworks
✗ Sentry Cons
- Event quotas can be exceeded during incidents
- Alert fatigue if not properly configured
- Performance monitoring less mature than Datadog
The Verdict
Immich is built for self hosters and families, with a focus on photo-backup and facial-recognition. Sentry targets developers and frontend teams and leads with error-tracking and performance-monitoring.
On pricing, Immich is the clear winner for budget-conscious users — starting at $0/mo compared to $26/mo for Sentry. That $26/mo difference adds up quickly for growing teams.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Feature-wise, Sentry offers broader built-in capabilities (8 features vs 7), while Immich takes a more focused approach — which can mean a simpler, faster onboarding experience.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.