Hoppscotch icon

Hoppscotch

★★★★★ 4.5
VS
Mattermost icon

Mattermost

★★★★ 4.2
Feature Hoppscotch Mattermost
Pricing Free / from $7/mo Free / from $10/mo
Free Plan ✓ Yes ✓ Yes
Rating 4.5 / 5 4.2 / 5
Best For developers, open-source-teams, api-testing, lightweight-alternative devops-teams, security-conscious-orgs, government, enterprise
Founded 2019 2015
Rest Client
Graphql Client
Websocket Testing
Collections
Environments
Team Collaboration
Self Hostable
Messaging
Channels
Playbooks
Integrations
Self Hosting
Compliance

✓ Hoppscotch Pros

  • Open-source and self-hostable
  • Lightweight and fast (browser-based, no download)
  • Supports REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, SSE, Socket.IO
  • Team collaboration with shared collections

✗ Hoppscotch Cons

  • Fewer features than Postman for enterprise use
  • Limited mock server capabilities
  • Desktop app less mature than web version

✓ Mattermost Pros

  • Self-hostable
  • Open source
  • DevOps integrations
  • Secure

✗ Mattermost Cons

  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Fewer integrations than Slack
  • Self-hosting complexity

The Verdict

Hoppscotch is built for developers and open source teams, with a focus on rest-client and graphql-client. Mattermost targets devops teams and security conscious orgs and leads with messaging and channels.

Pricing is close: Hoppscotch starts at $7/mo versus $10/mo for Mattermost — not a deciding factor on its own.

Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.

Feature-wise, Hoppscotch offers broader built-in capabilities (7 features vs 6), while Mattermost takes a more focused approach — which can mean a simpler, faster onboarding experience.

Bottom line: Hoppscotch has a slight overall edge — but if self-hostable matters most to you, Mattermost may still be the right call.

Related Comparisons

Stay ahead of AI — Weekly tool picks, straight to your inbox.

Join thousands of professionals who get curated AI tool recommendations every week. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.