Hiver
Jam
| Feature | Hiver | Jam |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $19/mo | Free / from $5/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Best For | small-teams, gmail-users, support-teams, startups | qa-teams, developers, product-managers, customer-support |
| Founded | 2011 | 2021 |
| Shared Inboxes | ✓ | ✗ |
| Email Assignment | ✓ | ✗ |
| Collision Detection | ✓ | ✗ |
| Analytics | ✓ | ✗ |
| Automations | ✓ | ✗ |
| Sla Management | ✓ | ✗ |
| Screen Capture | ✗ | ✓ |
| Console Logs | ✗ | ✓ |
| Network Requests | ✗ | ✓ |
| Device Info | ✗ | ✓ |
| Integrations | ✗ | ✓ |
| Annotations | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Hiver Pros
- Works inside Gmail
- Easy adoption
- Shared inboxes
- Good for email teams
✗ Hiver Cons
- Gmail-only
- Limited outside email
- Fewer features than full helpdesks
✓ Jam Pros
- One-click bug reports
- Auto-captures technical info
- Integrates with Jira/Linear/etc
- Very easy to use
✗ Jam Cons
- Browser extension only
- Limited to web apps
- Basic for complex debugging
The Verdict
Hiver is built for small teams and gmail users, with a focus on shared-inboxes and email-assignment. Jam targets qa teams and developers and leads with screen-capture and console-logs.
On pricing, Jam is the clear winner for budget-conscious users — starting at $5/mo compared to $19/mo for Hiver. That $14/mo difference adds up quickly for growing teams.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.