HiBob
Lever
| Feature | HiBob | Lever |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free Plan | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Best For | fast-growing-companies, tech-companies, multinational-teams, people-ops | tech-companies, growing-companies, talent-teams, recruiters |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
| Core Hr | ✓ | ✗ |
| Onboarding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Time Off | ✓ | ✗ |
| Performance | ✓ | ✗ |
| Compensation | ✓ | ✗ |
| People Analytics | ✓ | ✗ |
| Ats | ✗ | ✓ |
| Talent Crm | ✗ | ✓ |
| Nurture Campaigns | ✗ | ✓ |
| Interview Scheduling | ✗ | ✓ |
| Analytics | ✗ | ✓ |
| Integrations | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ HiBob Pros
- Beautiful modern interface
- Good for culture management
- Flexible for multinational teams
- Strong onboarding flows
✗ HiBob Cons
- Pricing not transparent
- Limited payroll (partners only)
- Growing feature set
✓ Lever Pros
- Combined ATS + CRM
- Great candidate experience
- Nurture campaigns
- Clean UI
✗ Lever Cons
- Expensive
- Limited reporting
- Customization constraints
The Verdict
HiBob is built for fast growing companies and tech companies, with a focus on core-hr and onboarding. Lever targets tech companies and growing companies and leads with ats and talent-crm.
Both tools use custom enterprise pricing — you'll need to contact sales for a quote, which makes direct cost comparison difficult.
Neither tool offers a free plan, so factor the subscription cost into your decision from the start.
Both tools are a solid fit for tech companies — in those cases, the decision often comes down to workflow style and how your team prefers to organize work.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.