Hasura
NocoDB
| Feature | Hasura | NocoDB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $99/mo | Free / from $12/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Best For | backend-developers, startups, api-developers, full-stack-teams | developers, self-hosters, data-teams, startups |
| Founded | 2017 | 2021 |
| Graphql Api | ✓ | ✗ |
| Rest Api | ✓ | ✗ |
| Real Time | ✓ | ✗ |
| Authorization | ✓ | ✗ |
| Event Triggers | ✓ | ✗ |
| Remote Schemas | ✓ | ✗ |
| Smart Spreadsheet | ✗ | ✓ |
| Database Connectors | ✗ | ✓ |
| Forms | ✗ | ✓ |
| Automations | ✗ | ✓ |
| Api | ✗ | ✓ |
| Views | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Hasura Pros
- Instant APIs
- Real-time subscriptions
- Great developer experience
- Performance
✗ Hasura Cons
- PostgreSQL-focused
- Complex authorization
- Pricing changes
✓ NocoDB Pros
- Open-source
- Connect to existing databases
- Self-hostable
- Good API
✗ NocoDB Cons
- Less polished than Airtable
- Fewer integrations
- Documentation could improve
The Verdict
Hasura is built for backend developers and startups, with a focus on graphql-api and rest-api. NocoDB targets developers and self hosters and leads with smart-spreadsheet and database-connectors.
On pricing, NocoDB is the clear winner for budget-conscious users — starting at $12/mo compared to $99/mo for Hasura. That $87/mo difference adds up quickly for growing teams.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Both tools are a solid fit for startups — in those cases, the decision often comes down to workflow style and how your team prefers to organize work.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.