GitHub Copilot
Sourcegraph
| Feature | GitHub Copilot | Sourcegraph |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $10/mo | Free / from $9/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Best For | developers, engineering-teams, open-source-contributors, students | engineering-teams, enterprises, open-source-maintainers, platform-engineers |
| Founded | 2021 | 2013 |
| Code Completion | ✓ | ✗ |
| Chat | ✓ | ✗ |
| Pull Request Summaries | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cli Suggestions | ✓ | ✗ |
| Multi File Context | ✓ | ✗ |
| Security Scanning | ✓ | ✗ |
| Code Search | ✗ | ✓ |
| Code Navigation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Batch Changes | ✗ | ✓ |
| Ai Assistant | ✗ | ✓ |
| Code Insights | ✗ | ✓ |
| Notebooks | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ GitHub Copilot Pros
- Context-aware suggestions
- Multi-language support
- Chat interface
- IDE integration
✗ GitHub Copilot Cons
- Subscription cost
- Occasional wrong suggestions
- Privacy considerations
✓ Sourcegraph Pros
- Search across all repositories
- Excellent code navigation
- Batch Changes for mass refactoring
- Cody AI assistant
✗ Sourcegraph Cons
- Complex self-hosted setup
- Expensive for enterprise
- Learning curve for advanced features
The Verdict
GitHub Copilot is built for developers and engineering teams, with a focus on code-completion and chat. Sourcegraph targets engineering teams and enterprises and leads with code-search and code-navigation.
Pricing is close: Sourcegraph starts at $9/mo versus $10/mo for GitHub Copilot — not a deciding factor on its own.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Both tools are a solid fit for engineering teams — in those cases, the decision often comes down to workflow style and how your team prefers to organize work.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.