Gamma
InVision
| Feature | Gamma | InVision |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $10/mo | Free / from $7.95/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Best For | professionals, educators, marketers, consultants | design-teams, product-managers, stakeholder-reviews, legacy-users |
| Founded | 2020 | 2011 |
| Ai Generation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Responsive Design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Templates | ✓ | ✗ |
| Collaboration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Analytics | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Prototyping | ✗ | ✓ |
| Freehand Whiteboard | ✗ | ✓ |
| Design Systems | ✗ | ✓ |
| Inspect Mode | ✗ | ✓ |
| Commenting | ✗ | ✓ |
| User Testing | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Gamma Pros
- AI generates full presentations
- Responsive design (works on mobile)
- No design skills needed
- Fast content creation
✗ Gamma Cons
- Limited export options
- AI content needs editing
- Fewer templates than traditional tools
✓ InVision Pros
- Excellent prototyping with hotspots and transitions
- Freehand whiteboarding for brainstorming
- Design system manager (DSM) for consistency
- Good stakeholder review and commenting workflow
✗ InVision Cons
- Company has pivoted and scaled down significantly
- Studio product was discontinued
- Most teams have migrated to Figma
The Verdict
Gamma is built for professionals and educators, with a focus on ai-generation and responsive-design. InVision targets design teams and product managers and leads with prototyping and freehand-whiteboard.
Pricing is close: InVision starts at $7.95/mo versus $10/mo for Gamma — not a deciding factor on its own.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Gamma edges out on user ratings (4.5 vs 3.8). While both are well-regarded, that gap reflects real differences in user satisfaction worth considering.
Bottom line: Gamma has a slight overall edge — but if excellent prototyping with hotspots and transitions matters most to you, InVision may still be the right call.