Folk
Miro
| Feature | Folk | Miro |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $20/mo | Free / from $8/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Best For | agencies, founders, partnerships-teams, investor-relations | designers, product-teams, remote-teams, facilitators |
| Founded | 2020 | 2011 |
| Contact Management | ✓ | ✗ |
| Pipelines | ✓ | ✗ |
| Email Sequences | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mail Merge | ✓ | ✗ |
| Browser Extension | ✓ | ✗ |
| Enrichment | ✓ | ✗ |
| Integrations | ✓ | ✓ |
| Whiteboard | ✗ | ✓ |
| Templates | ✗ | ✓ |
| Voting | ✗ | ✓ |
| Timer | ✗ | ✓ |
| Video Chat | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Folk Pros
- Intuitive spreadsheet-like interface
- Browser extension captures contacts from anywhere
- Built-in email sequences and mail merge
- Great for lightweight relationship management
✗ Folk Cons
- Limited reporting and analytics
- Not suited for large enterprise sales teams
- Fewer automations than Salesforce/HubSpot
✓ Miro Pros
- Infinite canvas
- Great for workshops
- Templates
- Integrations
✗ Miro Cons
- Can be slow with large boards
- Free plan limited
- Learning curve
The Verdict
Folk is built for agencies and founders, with a focus on contact-management and pipelines. Miro targets designers and product teams and leads with whiteboard and templates.
On pricing, Miro is the clear winner for budget-conscious users — starting at $8/mo compared to $20/mo for Folk. That $12/mo difference adds up quickly for growing teams.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Feature-wise, Folk offers broader built-in capabilities (7 features vs 6), while Miro takes a more focused approach — which can mean a simpler, faster onboarding experience.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.
