Focalboard
Grist
| Feature | Focalboard | Grist |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free only | Free / from $10/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Best For | self-hosters, mattermost-users, small-teams, open-source-advocates | developers, data-teams, non-profits, open-source-advocates |
| Founded | 2021 | 2019 |
| Kanban Boards | ✓ | ✗ |
| Table View | ✓ | ✗ |
| Calendar View | ✓ | ✗ |
| Templates | ✓ | ✗ |
| Filters | ✓ | ✗ |
| Self Hosting | ✓ | ✗ |
| Relational Data | ✗ | ✓ |
| Python Formulas | ✗ | ✓ |
| Custom Widgets | ✗ | ✓ |
| Access Rules | ✗ | ✓ |
| Incremental Imports | ✗ | ✓ |
| Api | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Focalboard Pros
- Completely free and open-source
- Self-hostable for data control
- Multiple view types (board, table, gallery)
- Integrates with Mattermost
✗ Focalboard Cons
- Limited to basic project tracking
- No built-in time tracking
- Smaller community than alternatives
✓ Grist Pros
- Fully open-source (Apache 2.0)
- Python formulas instead of spreadsheet formulas
- Self-hostable
- Strong access control and permissions
✗ Grist Cons
- Fewer integrations than Airtable
- Smaller template library
- Less intuitive for non-technical users
The Verdict
Focalboard is built for self hosters and mattermost users, with a focus on kanban-boards and table-view. Grist targets developers and data teams and leads with relational-data and python-formulas.
Focalboard uses custom enterprise pricing, while Grist starts at $10/mo — a tangible advantage for teams with a fixed budget.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Both tools are a solid fit for open source advocates — in those cases, the decision often comes down to workflow style and how your team prefers to organize work.
Bottom line: Grist has a slight overall edge — but if completely free and open-source matters most to you, Focalboard may still be the right call.