Filevine
Litify
| Feature | Filevine | Litify |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free Plan | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Best For | plaintiff-firms, insurance-defense, personal-injury, litigation-teams | mid-size-firms, mass-tort-firms, corporate-legal, plaintiff-firms |
| Founded | 2014 | 2016 |
| Case Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Document Automation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Ai Contracts | ✓ | ✗ |
| Task Management | ✓ | ✗ |
| Reporting | ✓ | ✗ |
| Client Portal | ✓ | ✗ |
| Intake Automation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Business Intelligence | ✗ | ✓ |
| Document Management | ✗ | ✓ |
| Time Billing | ✗ | ✓ |
| Workflow Automation | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Filevine Pros
- Excellent for litigation firms
- Good document automation
- AI contract tools
- Strong task management
✗ Filevine Cons
- Not ideal for transactional practice
- Pricing not transparent
- Implementation timeline long
✓ Litify Pros
- Salesforce platform reliability
- Excellent analytics and reporting
- Customizable workflows
- Strong for mass tort firms
✗ Litify Cons
- Expensive implementation
- Salesforce knowledge needed
- Complex for small firms
The Verdict
Filevine is built for plaintiff firms and insurance defense, with a focus on case-management and document-automation. Litify targets mid size firms and mass tort firms and leads with case-management and intake-automation.
Both tools use custom enterprise pricing — you'll need to contact sales for a quote, which makes direct cost comparison difficult.
Neither tool offers a free plan, so factor the subscription cost into your decision from the start.
Both tools are a solid fit for plaintiff firms — in those cases, the decision often comes down to workflow style and how your team prefers to organize work.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.