Fauna
Hasura
| Feature | Fauna | Hasura |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $0.01/mo | Free / from $99/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Best For | serverless-developers, jamstack-apps, globally-distributed-apps, startups | backend-developers, startups, api-developers, full-stack-teams |
| Founded | 2012 | 2017 |
| Acid Transactions | ✓ | ✗ |
| Document Relational | ✓ | ✗ |
| Graphql Native | ✓ | ✗ |
| Global Distribution | ✓ | ✗ |
| Event Streaming | ✓ | ✗ |
| Multi Tenancy | ✓ | ✗ |
| Temporality | ✓ | ✗ |
| Graphql Api | ✗ | ✓ |
| Rest Api | ✗ | ✓ |
| Real Time | ✗ | ✓ |
| Authorization | ✗ | ✓ |
| Event Triggers | ✗ | ✓ |
| Remote Schemas | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Fauna Pros
- Globally distributed with strong consistency
- Combines document and relational models
- Native GraphQL and FQL query support
- Serverless with no infrastructure to manage
✗ Fauna Cons
- Proprietary query language (FQL) has learning curve
- Can be expensive at high read/write volumes
- Smaller community compared to MongoDB or PostgreSQL
✓ Hasura Pros
- Instant APIs
- Real-time subscriptions
- Great developer experience
- Performance
✗ Hasura Cons
- PostgreSQL-focused
- Complex authorization
- Pricing changes
The Verdict
Fauna is built for serverless developers and jamstack apps, with a focus on acid-transactions and document-relational. Hasura targets backend developers and startups and leads with graphql-api and rest-api.
On pricing, Fauna is the clear winner for budget-conscious users — starting at $0.01/mo compared to $99/mo for Hasura. That $98.99/mo difference adds up quickly for growing teams.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Hasura edges out on user ratings (4.4 vs 4.1). While both are well-regarded, that gap reflects real differences in user satisfaction worth considering.
Feature-wise, Fauna offers broader built-in capabilities (7 features vs 6), while Hasura takes a more focused approach — which can mean a simpler, faster onboarding experience.
Both tools are a solid fit for startups — in those cases, the decision often comes down to workflow style and how your team prefers to organize work.
Bottom line: Hasura has a slight overall edge — but if globally distributed with strong consistency matters most to you, Fauna may still be the right call.