Depot
PagerDuty
| Feature | Depot | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $20/mo | Free / from $21/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Best For | engineering-teams, ci-cd-pipelines, monorepo-teams, docker-heavy-teams | devops-engineers, sre-teams, on-call-teams, enterprise |
| Founded | 2022 | 2009 |
| Fast Builds | ✓ | ✗ |
| Remote Caching | ✓ | ✗ |
| Github Actions | ✓ | ✗ |
| Multi Platform Builds | ✓ | ✗ |
| Buildkit Compatible | ✓ | ✗ |
| Build Analytics | ✓ | ✗ |
| Incident Management | ✗ | ✓ |
| On Call Scheduling | ✗ | ✓ |
| Escalation Policies | ✗ | ✓ |
| Event Intelligence | ✗ | ✓ |
| Automation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Status Pages | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Depot Pros
- Dramatically faster Docker builds
- Drop-in replacement for docker build
- Native layer caching
- GitHub Actions integration
✗ Depot Cons
- Only for container builds
- Costs scale with usage
- Newer platform
✓ PagerDuty Pros
- Reliable alerting
- Great escalation policies
- Many integrations
- AIOps capabilities
✗ PagerDuty Cons
- Expensive at scale
- Complex rule setup
- Can be noisy
The Verdict
Depot is built for engineering teams and ci cd pipelines, with a focus on fast-builds and remote-caching. PagerDuty targets devops engineers and sre teams and leads with incident-management and on-call-scheduling.
Pricing is close: Depot starts at $20/mo versus $21/mo for PagerDuty — not a deciding factor on its own.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.