Continue
Directus
| Feature | Continue | Directus |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free only | Free / from $99/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Best For | developers, open-source-advocates, privacy-focused-devs, self-hosters | developers, agencies, content-teams, data-driven-teams |
| Founded | 2023 | 2016 |
| Autocomplete | ✓ | ✗ |
| Chat | ✓ | ✗ |
| Inline Editing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Multi Model Support | ✓ | ✗ |
| Context Providers | ✓ | ✗ |
| Custom Commands | ✓ | ✗ |
| Data Studio | ✗ | ✓ |
| Rest Api | ✗ | ✓ |
| Graphql Api | ✗ | ✓ |
| Flows | ✗ | ✓ |
| Permissions | ✗ | ✓ |
| File Management | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Continue Pros
- Fully open-source (Apache 2.0)
- Works with any LLM provider
- VS Code and JetBrains support
- Local model support
✗ Continue Cons
- Requires self-configuration of LLM
- Less polished than Copilot
- Setup can be complex for beginners
✓ Directus Pros
- Open source
- Database-first
- Beautiful admin UI
- REST + GraphQL
✗ Directus Cons
- Self-hosting required for free
- Smaller community
- Documentation gaps
The Verdict
Continue is built for developers and open source advocates, with a focus on autocomplete and chat. Directus targets developers and agencies and leads with data-studio and rest-api.
Continue uses custom enterprise pricing, while Directus starts at $99/mo — a tangible advantage for teams with a fixed budget.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Both tools are a solid fit for developers — in those cases, the decision often comes down to workflow style and how your team prefers to organize work.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.