Appsmith
Continue
| Feature | Continue | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $40/mo | Free only |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Best For | developers, startups, internal-tools-teams, engineering-teams | developers, open-source-advocates, privacy-focused-devs, self-hosters |
| Founded | 2019 | 2023 |
| Drag And Drop | ✓ | ✗ |
| Api Integration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Javascript Customization | ✓ | ✗ |
| Git Sync | ✓ | ✗ |
| Access Control | ✓ | ✗ |
| Self Hosting | ✓ | ✗ |
| Autocomplete | ✗ | ✓ |
| Chat | ✗ | ✓ |
| Inline Editing | ✗ | ✓ |
| Multi Model Support | ✗ | ✓ |
| Context Providers | ✗ | ✓ |
| Custom Commands | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Appsmith Pros
- Open source
- Self-hostable
- Good API integration
- Active community
✗ Appsmith Cons
- Learning curve
- Limited templates
- Performance issues with complex apps
✓ Continue Pros
- Fully open-source (Apache 2.0)
- Works with any LLM provider
- VS Code and JetBrains support
- Local model support
✗ Continue Cons
- Requires self-configuration of LLM
- Less polished than Copilot
- Setup can be complex for beginners
The Verdict
Appsmith is built for developers and startups, with a focus on drag-and-drop and api-integration. Continue targets developers and open source advocates and leads with autocomplete and chat.
Continue uses custom enterprise pricing, while Appsmith starts at $40/mo — a tangible advantage for teams with a fixed budget.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Both tools are a solid fit for developers — in those cases, the decision often comes down to workflow style and how your team prefers to organize work.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.