Agorapulse
Sprout Social
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $49/mo | From $249/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Best For | agencies, small-businesses, social-media-managers, marketing-teams | enterprise, agencies, social-media-teams, brands |
| Founded | 2011 | 2010 |
| Scheduling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Inbox | ✓ | ✓ |
| Monitoring | ✓ | ✗ |
| Reporting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Roi Tracking | ✓ | ✗ |
| Team Collaboration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Analytics | ✗ | ✓ |
| Social Listening | ✗ | ✓ |
| Advocacy | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Agorapulse Pros
- Good inbox management
- Affordable vs competitors
- ROI reporting
- Easy to use
✗ Agorapulse Cons
- Limited listening
- Fewer platforms
- Basic analytics on lower plans
✓ Sprout Social Pros
- Powerful analytics
- All-in-one platform
- Great reporting
- Social listening
✗ Sprout Social Cons
- Very expensive
- Per-profile pricing
- Overkill for small teams
The Verdict
Agorapulse is built for agencies and small businesses, with a focus on scheduling and inbox. Sprout Social targets enterprise and agencies and leads with scheduling and analytics.
On pricing, Agorapulse is the clear winner for budget-conscious users — starting at $49/mo compared to $249/mo for Sprout Social. That $200/mo difference adds up quickly for growing teams.
Agorapulse has a free plan, which gives it a meaningful edge for individuals and small teams exploring their options. Sprout Social requires a paid subscription from day one.
Both tools are a solid fit for agencies — in those cases, the decision often comes down to workflow style and how your team prefers to organize work.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.