Activepieces
Harbor
| Feature | Activepieces | Harbor |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $10/mo | Free only |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Best For | developers, startups, privacy-focused-teams, automation-builders | enterprise-devops, container-teams, security-teams, regulated-industries |
| Founded | 2022 | 2016 |
| Visual Builder | ✓ | ✗ |
| Ai Copilot | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branching Logic | ✓ | ✗ |
| Self Hosting | ✓ | ✗ |
| Pieces Framework | ✓ | ✗ |
| Webhooks | ✓ | ✗ |
| Container Registry | ✗ | ✓ |
| Vulnerability Scanning | ✗ | ✓ |
| Rbac | ✗ | ✓ |
| Image Signing | ✗ | ✓ |
| Replication | ✗ | ✓ |
| Garbage Collection | ✗ | ✓ |
| Audit Logs | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Activepieces Pros
- Open-source and self-hostable
- AI helps build automations from descriptions
- Clean visual workflow builder
- Growing piece (connector) library
✗ Activepieces Cons
- Fewer integrations than Zapier/Make
- Community still growing
- Self-hosted requires maintenance
✓ Harbor Pros
- Completely free and CNCF graduated project
- Built-in vulnerability scanning (Trivy integration)
- Image signing and policy enforcement
- Multi-registry replication for geo-distribution
✗ Harbor Cons
- Requires self-hosting and infrastructure management
- UI is functional but not modern
- Initial setup complexity for production
The Verdict
Activepieces is built for developers and startups, with a focus on visual-builder and ai-copilot. Harbor targets enterprise devops and container teams and leads with container-registry and vulnerability-scanning.
Harbor uses custom enterprise pricing, while Activepieces starts at $10/mo — a tangible advantage for teams with a fixed budget.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Feature-wise, Harbor offers broader built-in capabilities (7 features vs 6), while Activepieces takes a more focused approach — which can mean a simpler, faster onboarding experience.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.