Activepieces
AutoGen
| Feature | Activepieces | AutoGen |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / from $10/mo | Free only |
| Free Plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Best For | developers, startups, privacy-focused-teams, automation-builders | ai-researchers, developers, enterprise-ai-teams, data-scientists |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Visual Builder | ✓ | ✗ |
| Ai Copilot | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branching Logic | ✓ | ✗ |
| Self Hosting | ✓ | ✗ |
| Pieces Framework | ✓ | ✗ |
| Webhooks | ✓ | ✗ |
| Multi Agent | ✗ | ✓ |
| Code Execution | ✗ | ✓ |
| Human In Loop | ✗ | ✓ |
| Tool Integration | ✗ | ✓ |
| Customizable Agents | ✗ | ✓ |
| Conversation Patterns | ✗ | ✓ |
✓ Activepieces Pros
- Open-source and self-hostable
- AI helps build automations from descriptions
- Clean visual workflow builder
- Growing piece (connector) library
✗ Activepieces Cons
- Fewer integrations than Zapier/Make
- Community still growing
- Self-hosted requires maintenance
✓ AutoGen Pros
- Microsoft backed
- Multi-agent conversations
- Flexible
- Active development
✗ AutoGen Cons
- Complex setup
- Documentation gaps
- Requires coding expertise
The Verdict
Activepieces is built for developers and startups, with a focus on visual-builder and ai-copilot. AutoGen targets ai researchers and developers and leads with multi-agent and code-execution.
AutoGen uses custom enterprise pricing, while Activepieces starts at $10/mo — a tangible advantage for teams with a fixed budget.
Both offer free plans, so you can test each with your real workflow before committing to a subscription.
Both tools are a solid fit for developers — in those cases, the decision often comes down to workflow style and how your team prefers to organize work.
This is a genuinely close comparison. If you can, sign up for both free trials (where available) and run a one-week test with your actual team tasks before deciding.